The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.
Ok.
I was a bit underwhelmed. Maybe it was that expectation was high. Everyone is reading it; everyone thinks it's SOOOO good. It wasn't bad. It was 'kind of good' in my book. It was slightly disturbing. I know this is one of three in a series - I definitely felt there were some loose ends not fully tied up. I am not sure if I want to commit to reading the other two books (but I probably will because a coworker already lent me the second book).
Granted it was a (not lighthearted) mystery. I won't spoil it, but it was kind of predictable in the sense that the person who wasn't a suspect was the shocking twist culprit, with all kinds of red herrings along the way. What I found most interesting was this author and his perception of men and women. I know he is dead - I am curious his views and what he was really trying to say with this book.
That being said - and I realize I am about to get a lot of backlash on this - I don't think he is THAT great of a writer. Stieg Larsson. It was good. He COULD be a great writer - but I'm not sure this book showed it. But I don't think this book could have only been written by some writer of genius caliber - as most people seem to think. I seem to remember after the DaVinci Code was released and made it big - everyone was all like 'this book is sooo great, omg' - then came a wave of 'Dan Brown is overrated'. I forsee the 'Stieg Larsson is overrated' movement coming through soon.
I will also say this - on a side-by-side comparison of two books, I personally (gasp!) liked the DaVinci Code better.
Your thoughts?